Karol Filar vs Filip Kosinski Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Recent second serve performance: In the past 6 months, Filar has achieved a 37.61% win rate on their second serve, while Kosinski has managed 38.1%. Does this slight edge favor Kosinski? It seems so.
• Return game effectiveness: Filar has won 45.2% of points on opponents' second serves recently, compared to Kosinski's stronger 56.52%. However, in returning first serves, Filar has an advantage with 32.04% over Kosinski's 28.77%.
• Pressure management: Filar has been more successful under pressure, saving 48.03% of breakpoints, contrasting with Kosinski's lower 23.08% save rate. Could this be pivotal?
• Yearly match performance: Filar has a 51.52% match win rate over the last year, while Kosinski has not won a single match, recording a 0% win rate.
• Surface proficiency: Filar's best performance is on Clay with a 59% win rate, whereas Kosinski struggles significantly on this surface, failing to win any of his ten matches.
• Tournament level experience: Both players predominantly compete at the $10K tournament level. Filar has a win rate of 53.13%, whereas Kosinski again sits at 0% in recent matches.
• Opponent quality: Filar has faced opponents with an average rank of 428.18, whereas Kosinski's opponents had a higher average rank of 172, indicating a more challenging path.
• Deciding set outcomes: If the match extends into a deciding set, Filar has won only 22% of these scenarios, with Kosinski yet to win any.
• Breakpoint conversion rate: Recently, Filar has converted 37.68% of breakpoints, compared to Kosinski's superior 50% conversion rate. Will this provide Kosinski with critical edge points?

Editorial Prediction (July 29, 2025, UTC):

Based on second serve performance, both players have shown comparable stats with Kosinski having a slight edge. However, Kosinski outshines Filar in return game stats, particularly against second serves, which could be a crucial factor in the match.

Filar shows resilience under pressure with a higher breakpoint save percentage but has struggled in converting crucial breakpoints compared to Kosinski. This mix of strengths and weaknesses can tilt the match dramatically during close games.

Filar’s overall better-winning record over the past year provides a historical advantage, especially on clay where Kosinski has underperformed drastically. However, the level of opposition faced by Kosinski has been notably tougher.

Despite Filar's significant advantage in match experience and past performance, Kosinski’s higher success in breakpoint conversion could disrupt the dynamics if he capitalizes effectively at critical moments.

Considering these factors, Filar appears to be the likely winner, provided he can withstand Kosinski's strong return game and capitalize on his experience in clinching matches.